Reasoned Order of the Tribunal on: (i) the discontinuance of proceedings; and (ii) costs.
The Tribunal concluded that there was no purpose in the appeal since the issues raised by the appellant had been addressed by the Tribunal in its judgment of 18 December 2006 ([2006] CAT 36) in Dŵr Cymru/Shotton Paper in which Aquavitae (UK) Limited had participated as an intervener.
The only issue remaining was costs which the Tribunal decided should lie where they fell since Aquavitae’s costs as an intervener in the Dŵr Cymru/Shotton Paper case had already been dealt with by agreement.
